This is your life we are talking about , please note the severity of this post.

Would you be surprised if I told you that the entire legal system was created under a maritime admiralty jurisdiction of law and is the law of the sea and is in essence piracy?

Did you know that the true law of the land on most countries is the common law ( case law ) which is the only true law. Legal is an arbitrary construct created by governments to restrict and obstruct all true law to make money in taxes, fines, tickets, summons, proceeds of crime, licensing, permits, and every other rule that create to intentionally make your life so difficult to live that they can then charge you or arrest you for it making billions of dollars a year.

A true crime is something that will be observed as something causing loss or harm. If the police were to see you assaulting someone on the street they would simply arrest you and put you in a cage without question or worry about seeing any Identification. That is true police work. that is what is known as acting as a peace officer. He is then acting in accordance with the law.

When he is enforcing policy he is not acting in accordance with the law but in a legal capacity which means that in order to charge you he first needs to see a charging instrument of some kind, a license, a permit, an insurance policy or a government issued identification card of some type. Without one he can not make charges.

All things legal are unlawful because the enforcement of things called legal always cause loss and harm and are done fraudulently.

The definition of a legal statute is a rule of a society given the force of law. Therefore it is merely a rule that is enforced by men with guns using force to gain compliance and that is a crime against every human being that has ever been subjected to it.

Common law defined means : do no harm, cause no loss, do no fraud.

Every act of statutory law enforcement contains three things, a monetary ticket or fine causing loss, handcuffing, assault, tazering, murder which is harm, and even just loss of your time, and every ticket is a fraudulent contract since no one on their side is giving consideration and you are coerced under duress to accept and or sign it.

A name and date of birth ( berth ) why do cops always ask for it ?

Birth is another one of those words that will create joinder to the legal fiction all caps person.

You can give them your title as I do I was given the title of Mika and My family is the family of Rasila, What is my date of birth? any comment I would have on this is clearly hearsay since I was much too young at the time to verify that information and hearsay is inadmissible in any court, I was told I was born in the month of December in the year 1966 but that was a really long time ago and the people who told me this information are now all deceased.

But the point is the berth, It creates joinder to the legal person and you can never do that , that is also the simple reason you should never have any ID.... It is actionable. The police as you have seen with my long list of pullovers will not arrest or act on me physically since they NEED to see proof that I am in their legal jurisdiction.

Have you ever thought about hearings and trials ?

It seems to me that first they need to be able to hear you right ? I have gone to court and the judge has said that unless I am agent or principle in this matter that I cannot hear you. I'm sure you have heard this right ? maybe not ? well it is a thing.

So as a sovereign in their administrative admiralty jurisdiction courtrooms if I do not have any paperwork or contracts to prove that I am a person / citizen of the corporation Canada they can not hear me but if I did and this is what they have a hearing for to make sure that they can in fact hear me and to make sure that I am represented by a lawyer which I will not do, I always stand as agent for the person on the docket in propria persona sui juris without prejudice and claim common law jurisdiction andwaive the benefits of the court, Then once they have determined those two things they can take it to a place to try me and see what they can get away with and off we go to the next stage being a trial.

This is where they test your knowledge of law and statute to see if you have what it takes or know enough to not get charged or incarcerated.

Hearings ? Cant they hear you ?

Trials ? what can they get away with ?

Remember all statutory laws are arbitrary constructs written up on a whim to see how far they can push the governed public so they always need to "try" their cases to see if it will fly.

This again is what they are trying to do with this random breathalyser stuff if they can get away with it they will " try "

They are doing exactly this right now with all this COVID non issue hype, If you look at the CDC and World heath stats you will quickly realize you are being lied to in the worst possible way possible. They are using the ignorant masses to destroy even mmore of your rights and freedoms.

I wanted to try to simplify the point of claiming common law jurisdiction in an admiralty court and why it is necessary

A friend just messaged me that she got pulled over in her registered and licensed car and they stole her cigarettes coming off of the reserve in Ontario and then claim that she was buying them for the intent of selling them. If it is not bad enough to assume someone's intent? How can anyone ever assume your intentions?

But the point is this, You have to make your case in their courts and you have to first set up the playing field to get the type of court that can deal with what you have to say, never let them bring you back into their jurisdiction by letting them confuse you,

You have claimed common law and waived the benefits of the court .... period !!

So now you can tell the court that you wish to report a robbery, One of their costumed mercenaries took it upon himself to rob you of your lawful property and you have gone to their court to let them know that you would like your property back and that they had no right to detain you and rob you.

Once you have claimed the jurisdiction of the type of court that can help you with the robbery then you can tell them that you are there to report a robbery, give them the robber's name and details and stay in the common law.

Another so important point of law . please know this point of court procedure . the judge is not bound by oath if you ask him if he is , he has many oaths , you have to be specific. in canada ask this question while standing on the good side of the bar , The common side , where you still have standing .

" Is it not true that you are bound by fiduciary duty to her majesty the queen of england to do right by all manner of people under the laws of canada and for the usages of the province without fear or favor affection or ill will ? "

He must answer you or fall into dishonor. He is bound you are not but he knows he is bound to serve that that illegitimate queen entity.

 

A judge after being made to accept his judicial oath for the record a judge can not render a verdict if there is an unanswered question on that "same" record.

So you want to know the judges oath and state it clearly for the record as an answerable question. ( yes or no ) and then you are entitled to ask factual questions of the court.

Otherwise no facts are admissible to the record in court.

The reason this is important because until you have done this nothing in that court room is valid and the judge can and will do anything it wants to do at that moment because the court is not obligated to "do right" by you.

You first have to set the jurisdiction by claiming it by saying ( I claim common law jurisdiction ), You have to state that for the record or it is presumed that you accept their admiralty statutory jurisdiction.

I always also " waive the benefits of the court " and then I recite the judges oath as a question. ( judicial oath )

Typically at this point I will be told I am free to leave and I can then state for the " court of record " that the judge has dismissed all charges.

He won't say it, you have to say it.

If he leaves the court room and returns you have to do this all over again because when he returns the court has re-adjourned under a new jurisdiction.

first time is an exchequer, commercial revenue court , then second time he is reconvening an admiralty court then finally he comes in as a priest in Canon court. You must reassert YOUR Common law jurisdiction all three times.

Its a game and they respect you when you know how to play it.

There are thousands upon thousands of people being held in cages on fraudulent statutory charges by governments and courts who claim authority now listen please. These people did not know to ask the simple questions and stand on this simple court procedure .

What is the claim against me and who makes this claim against me ? Is this claim lawfully submitted and who is my accuser , Is there an injured party to this claim ?

These are questions you need to ask , your life and reputation is on the line.

Only an inured party can make a claim against you under the common law, someone who has been caused loss or harm by your actions whether it was malicious or accidental.

No police can make a claim against you, that is fraud, they work for the state and no matter how they present charges it is a conflict of interest since they work for the same people who's job it is to render verdict .

So who makes the claim against you ? have you hurt anyone ? been caught stealing from someone ? caused damage to property that is not yours ? reneged on a contract that you signed to provide a service ? If all those answers are NO then you need to see a valid reason why you have been summoned since these are the only reasons any court can say you have committed a crime.

They need to provide you with a lawful claim in writing or the accuser must be present to give testimony.

No administrative court can render verdict based on the accusations of police. That is a blatant conflict of interest based on hearsay by some guy they hired to collect summons . it is a conflict of interest and is inadmissible in any court.

You always need a valid lawfully admitted claim and an injured party otherwise they are just destroying your life to make money .

Nothing is acceptable when it causes loss or harm , even a parking ticket or jay walking infraction will ruin your life , you need clarification of terms , don't let them ruin your life .

I have never been charged because I have always known this .